[Comprehensive] Many Sanitary companies in Foshan were closed down due to safety problems

Since the beginning of the winter, news of factory explosions and fires have appeared in an endless stream due to dry weather. The Foshan government has successively issued series of measures to strengthen the supervision of the factory and strictly enforce the law.

From November 13, 2017 to January 9, 2018, a total of 12,158 potential production safety accidents were discovered in Gaoming District, Foshan City. There were 9,494 rectification hidden dangers, 2,706 rectification orders were issued, and 305 were closed down and discontinued; at the beginning of 2017 By January 10, 2018, Foshan City, Shishan Town, a total of 2.217 million yuan in economic penalty for safety production, of which a total of 170 companies involved in the inspection of dust explosions, issued 107 instructions for rectification orders, temporarily suspended production and rectification of 12 companies.

Among them, Foshan Jiedian Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. and Foshan Gaoming Zhengdong Home Co., Ltd. failed to implement the "three-simultaneous" safety production system, and did not formulate a dust-removal system. The dust at the operation site was not properly cleaned up in a timely manner. Ventilation devices and explosion-proof electrical equipment facilities were not established in accordance with the regulations. Enforcement personnel seized the switch of the electrical boxes in accordance with the law, and ordered the business premises to temporarily stop production operations. After review, production operations could be resumed.

On December 26th, a sanitary ware factory in Foshan Industrial Development Zone appeared to be clean and tidy. However, after careful investigation by the inspection team, it was found that there were illegal residents in the inner house and there were serious fire safety hidden dangers! The inspection team immediately initiated the rectification notice and dealt with blackouts. It ordered the company to rectify the deadline, eliminate potential safety hazards, and apply for resumption after the inspection team passed the inspection.

Foshan Tongye Wood Co., Ltd. had a large amount of wood and sawdust in the workshop, but the company did not install spray equipment in the workshop as required. Moreover, the inspectors also found that the wires around the equipment in the workshop were covered with sawdust, and once the wires were short-circuited, they could cause a fire or explosion. In addition, the inspectors also found that the company had illegal fire hazards, such as illegal construction, and the company was given a fine of 10,000 yuan.

Foshan Auchanshang Home Furnishing Factory was given a fine of 20,000 yuan for the reason that the plate evacuation channel in the factory was blocked and the fire hydrant in the factory did not do a good job of custody, and the open switch valve was actually discharged without water.

Nearly the sanitary ware enterprise of Nianguan will be on holiday soon. At this time, we must not loosen up the importance attached to the safety of the factory and eliminate the potential safety hazards in several aspects of daily production. Xiao Bian has the following suggestions:

1. Does the factory have "three violations"?

2. Is the factory environment clean and the materials are stored in an orderly manner?

3, whether the management of dangerous goods is standardized

4. Whether the key projects, key equipment and facilities are equipped with safety devices and safety warning signs

5. Whether the use of hot flashes has been approved and effective protective measures have been taken

6. Whether dangerous operations such as overhead suspension and limited space operations take safety precautions

7, whether the factory facilities meet the safety requirements

8. Whether the factory has set up safety exits and evacuation routes as required

9, whether the ventilation and dust removal requirements

10、Whether electrical equipment and installation meet industry standards and safety conditions

11. Does special equipment have effective safety use documents?

12. Does the major hazard source take effective monitoring measures?

13. Is the safety rules and regulations and safety operating procedures in place?